Chicago

+1 (312) 606-9690

1603 Orrington Avenue
Suite 305

Evanston, Illinois 60201

Detroit

+1 (248) 327-8000

202 E 3rd Street
Suite 200

Royal Oak, Michigan 48067

Frankfurt

+49 (69) 80903
60
Berliner Strasse 219

D-63067 Offenbach/Main

Shanghai

+86 (21) 6015-9588

Building 3, 5/F
3601 Dongfang Road

Pudong, Shanghai 200120

Exploring Conjoint Analysis Methods

conjoint analysis methods
Listen to article

Many of the RFPs we receive from our clients include requests for “conjoint analysis.” Unfortunately, this term and methodology can be ill-defined or not appropriate to meet the objectives of the research request. As researchers, it is our responsibility to help our clients better understand what they need and the best tools to employ to meet those needs.

>>Download our latest conjoint analysis eBook here.

Conjoint analysis offers a powerful set of tools that can quantify a number of metrics, including product or feature value; trade-offs customers are willing to make; and, in some cases, price elasticity for a product, feature, or brand. Clients and researchers have three core conjoint products to choose from:

  • Adaptive Conjoint Analysis (ACA)
    • The original replacement for traditional, card-sort conjoint
  • Choice-Based Conjoint (CBC)
    • The most popular, widely-used conjoint methodology
  • Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint (ACBC)
    • Combines elements of both ACA and CBC
Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint ACBC

Adaptive Conjoint Analysis was released by Sawtooth in 1985. The ACA model was designed as a computer-based tool to replace traditional card-sort conjoint. It enabled researchers to measure more attributes than they could with traditional conjoint methods, making ACA a popular option due to ease of use and more powerful analysis.

Next, Choice-Based Conjoint was released in the 1990s and quickly became the most popular choice. This method eliminated attribute ratings and rankings, instead showing full “product” profiles from which respondents must choose. When companies want to better understand how people make choices when facing challenging trade-offs, CBC is the most widely-used survey-based approach. CBC also is known as discrete choice modeling (DCM) or discrete choice experiments (DCE).

Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint is a newer methodology that was introduced around 2010. ACBC combines elements of CBC (Choice-Based Conjoint), artificial intelligence, and (optionally) dynamic list-building. It tends to probe more deeply into each respondent’s decision structure than traditional CBC. ACBC “combines the best aspects of adaptive interviewing with the realism and accuracy of choice data” (Orme, Brian. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis).

Still confused as to which research method is best for you? Contact us for a free consultation.

Related reading: A Brief Primer for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Get The Latest Insights

Leading #MRX Posts

B2B

Applying Minimax Thinking to Uncertain Pricing Decisions

Many pricing decisions assume markets behave uniformly. In reality, customer responses frequently vary based on switching costs, competitive alternatives, technical requirements, contractual structures, and the ability to pass costs through. A customer with multiple qualified alternatives may react very differently than a customer operating within a highly specialized application.

The debate begins almost immediately.

Read More »
Pricing Research

The Pricing Question Most Companies Never Ask

In its simplest form, minimax encourages decision-makers to consider the worst plausible outcome associated with each available option. Rather than focusing exclusively on the most likely result, it asks leaders to understand the downside attached to being wrong. For pricing teams, that perspective can be surprisingly valuable.

Read More »
Automotive + Transportation

In a Tariff Environment, Finding and Protecting Margin Isn’t Optional

At first glance, pricing in a tariff environment appears straightforward. Input costs rise by 20%, prices rise by 20%, and margins are preserved. The logic is simple and often serves as the foundation for internal pricing discussions. The problem is that customers do not make purchasing decisions based on your cost structure. They make purchasing decisions based on the value they receive and the alternatives available to them.

Read More »
Scroll to Top