Exploring Conjoint Analysis Methods

conjoint analysis methods
Listen to article

Many of the RFPs we receive from our clients include requests for “conjoint analysis.” Unfortunately, this term and methodology can be ill-defined or not appropriate to meet the objectives of the research request. As researchers, it is our responsibility to help our clients better understand what they need and the best tools to employ to meet those needs.

>>Download our latest conjoint analysis eBook here.

Conjoint analysis offers a powerful set of tools that can quantify a number of metrics, including product or feature value; trade-offs customers are willing to make; and, in some cases, price elasticity for a product, feature, or brand. Clients and researchers have three core conjoint products to choose from:

  • Adaptive Conjoint Analysis (ACA)
    • The original replacement for traditional, card-sort conjoint
  • Choice-Based Conjoint (CBC)
    • The most popular, widely-used conjoint methodology
  • Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint (ACBC)
    • Combines elements of both ACA and CBC
Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint ACBC

Adaptive Conjoint Analysis was released by Sawtooth in 1985. The ACA model was designed as a computer-based tool to replace traditional card-sort conjoint. It enabled researchers to measure more attributes than they could with traditional conjoint methods, making ACA a popular option due to ease of use and more powerful analysis.

Next, Choice-Based Conjoint was released in the 1990s and quickly became the most popular choice. This method eliminated attribute ratings and rankings, instead showing full “product” profiles from which respondents must choose. When companies want to better understand how people make choices when facing challenging trade-offs, CBC is the most widely-used survey-based approach. CBC also is known as discrete choice modeling (DCM) or discrete choice experiments (DCE).

Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint is a newer methodology that was introduced around 2010. ACBC combines elements of CBC (Choice-Based Conjoint), artificial intelligence, and (optionally) dynamic list-building. It tends to probe more deeply into each respondent’s decision structure than traditional CBC. ACBC “combines the best aspects of adaptive interviewing with the realism and accuracy of choice data” (Orme, Brian. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis).

Still confused as to which research method is best for you? Contact us for a free consultation.

Related reading: A Brief Primer for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Get The Latest Insights

Leading #MRX Posts

Discover how applying Emotion Intelligence can help you understand your brand’s Emotional Value through the power of market research.
Emotion Intelligence

How to Understand Your Brand’s “Emotional Value”

By Chuck Bean Do you know your brand’s “emotional value?” It’s understandable if the answer is no. Most brands don’t. Yet while understandable, it’s no longer a safe position to make assumptions about your brand’s emotional value, especially as it relates to your competition’s.  Even teams who can articulate language that can be descriptive of

Read More »
Predictive Path to Purchase studies and methodologies for customer purchase decisions

Predicting the Path Most Taken

By Chelsea May Companies that embark on Predictive Path to Purchase studies often report some combination of increased confidence in their existing marketing strategies coupled with valuable, previously unconsidered insights that become extremely beneficial competitive advantages. For an in-depth explanation of why Predictive Path to Purchase studies are so important in the modern media landscape,

Read More »
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top