Exploring Conjoint Analysis Methods

conjoint analysis methods
Listen to article

Many of the RFPs we receive from our clients include requests for “conjoint analysis.” Unfortunately, this term and methodology can be ill-defined or not appropriate to meet the objectives of the research request. As researchers, it is our responsibility to help our clients better understand what they need and the best tools to employ to meet those needs.

>>Download our latest conjoint analysis eBook here.

Conjoint analysis offers a powerful set of tools that can quantify a number of metrics, including product or feature value; trade-offs customers are willing to make; and, in some cases, price elasticity for a product, feature, or brand. Clients and researchers have three core conjoint products to choose from:

  • Adaptive Conjoint Analysis (ACA)
    • The original replacement for traditional, card-sort conjoint
  • Choice-Based Conjoint (CBC)
    • The most popular, widely-used conjoint methodology
  • Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint (ACBC)
    • Combines elements of both ACA and CBC
Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint ACBC

Adaptive Conjoint Analysis was released by Sawtooth in 1985. The ACA model was designed as a computer-based tool to replace traditional card-sort conjoint. It enabled researchers to measure more attributes than they could with traditional conjoint methods, making ACA a popular option due to ease of use and more powerful analysis.

Next, Choice-Based Conjoint was released in the 1990s and quickly became the most popular choice. This method eliminated attribute ratings and rankings, instead showing full “product” profiles from which respondents must choose. When companies want to better understand how people make choices when facing challenging trade-offs, CBC is the most widely-used survey-based approach. CBC also is known as discrete choice modeling (DCM) or discrete choice experiments (DCE).

Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint is a newer methodology that was introduced around 2010. ACBC combines elements of CBC (Choice-Based Conjoint), artificial intelligence, and (optionally) dynamic list-building. It tends to probe more deeply into each respondent’s decision structure than traditional CBC. ACBC “combines the best aspects of adaptive interviewing with the realism and accuracy of choice data” (Orme, Brian. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis).

Still confused as to which research method is best for you? Contact us for a free consultation.

Related reading: A Brief Primer for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Get The Latest Insights

Leading #MRX Posts

Market Sizing

Market Sizing is Not a One-Time Event

It’s not just a matter of the size of the market, but rather why, and how we should respond, position and innovate to improve market standing, future outcomes, and overall profitability.

Read More »
Customer Experience

The Use of AI in Quantitative Research: What to Adopt, What to Avoid

The integration of artificial intelligence into market research processes has been embraced by some as a game-changer, promising to streamline data collection, enhance analysis, and drive informed decision-making. However, as with any technological advancement, the advent of AI brings both opportunities and challenges, prompting researchers to navigate the terrain with caution and curiosity alike.

Read More »
Customer Experience

Show Me, Don’t Tell Me.

One of our recent innovations in our ongoing pursuit to optimize and perfect Emotion Intelligence research is the use of images in a “qual-then-quant” process to gain deeper and more authentic insights into how emotions and sentiment are driving purchase decisions (or not).

Read More »
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top